On 1/22/21 1:00 PM, Brian Leung wrote:
Tomohiro Matsui wrote a patch to support lookaround assertions in regexps some
time ago
(http://emacs.1067599.n8.nabble.com/Patch-for-lookaround-assertion-in-regexp-td121057.html#a23863009),
but it never got merged.
Is there still interest in something l
Tomohiro Matsui wrote a patch to support lookaround assertions in regexps some
time ago
(http://emacs.1067599.n8.nabble.com/Patch-for-lookaround-assertion-in-regexp-td121057.html#a23863009),
but it never got merged.
Is there still interest in something like this? If so I can try updating the
p
On 1/21/2021 5:45 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/21/2021 3:26 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Ken Brown wrote:
Thanks for the report. I've submitted a patch that fixes this:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2021q1/010995.html
Thanks. EBADF is the more "proper" errno value here, for fd < 0
Hi/2, Bruno!
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi KO,
>
>> On OS/2 kLIBC, the first parameter of putenv () is `const char *string'
>> not `char *string'.
>
> Can't you fix that in OS/2 kLIBC? Then a workaround in Gnulib would not be
> needed.
>
I have no such a right. Instead I'll suggest that to maintain
Hi, Bruno.
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi KO,
>
> Thanks, I applied patches 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, slightly modified. Some of the
> things that you put into the git commit message actually better belong in
> the code, as a comment.
>
Ok, I'll do so later.
Thanks for your effort!
--
KO Myung-Hun
Using
Hi/2.
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Applied with modifications:
>> -#if HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H && HAVE_MPROTECT
>> +#if HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H && HAVE_MPROTECT && (!defined __KLIBC__ || HAVE_MMAP)
>
> There's a comment two lines above, that explains why HAVE_MMAP is not
> the right test here. And since you write "OS/2
