Tim Rice wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
>
> > Tim Rice wrote:
> > > > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
> > >
> > > While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
> > > what is normally used for 6 and 7 is __USLC__ for th
Hi Bruno,
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Tim Rice wrote:
> > > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
> >
> > While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
> > what is normally used for 6 and 7 is __USLC__ for the native compiler
> > and __sysv5__
Hi,
The attached patch changes vasnprintf.c to avoid using %n in the general
case, ie when the return value of snprintf is usable. This should help
if more systems decide to make tighten %n usage. There are plans for
that in OpenBSD land.
The existing comments in vasnprintf.c mention systems w
[Re-adding bug-gnulib back in CC. Please keep bug-gnulib in CC.]
Benji Wiebe wrote:
> Hey thanks a lot for the feedback Bruno and Tim! My C is sort of rusty
> right now. I believe I've addressed all your concerns and suggestions in
> the patch below.
>
> Thanks again!
It is better, but there a
Tim Rice wrote:
> > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
>
> While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
> what is normally used for 6 and 7 is __USLC__ for the native compiler
> and __sysv5__ for gcc
>
> Ie.
> # elif defined __USLC__ || defined __sysv5__
Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> - func_module c-ldtoast
> + func_module c-ldtoastr
Thanks. Applied.
Bruno
