Re: argp-version-etc broken on OpenIndiana

2020-05-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Ah, I missed a use of that attribute within Gnulib when installing the recent changes for __has_attribute. I installed the attached patch to fix it, and the followup two patches (also attached) to fix some style nits I noticed while fixing the bug. Thanks for reporting it. >From 63dcb4d03efd09db847

Re: argp-version-etc broken on OpenIndiana

2020-05-06 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Hello again, looking at Hydra/Nixos, the autobuild system failed due to commit c08f85d made three days ago to gnulib, and it has not recovered since then. This seems to correspond to my report. Regards, Mats E Andersson [1] http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/gnu/inetutils-master

argp-version-etc broken on OpenIndiana

2020-05-06 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Hello there! I just tried to build Inetutils with a freshly updated Gnulib source, doing so for the first time in perhaps three weeks on my regular OpenIndiana system with gcc-4.3.3. To my surprice Gnulib source wreeks havoc on the file `argp-version-etc'. A build log is attached. My guess is that

Re: Wget bootstrapping problem

2020-05-06 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:22 AM Tim Rühsen wrote: > > On 05.05.20 03:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Paul Eggert wrote: > >>> We could switch the order such that Wget is the default and rsync is used > >>> as a > >>> fallback > >> > >> That sounds better than reverting, no? Perhaps you could propose a

Re: Wget bootstrapping problem

2020-05-06 Thread Bruno Haible
> We could also check for an existing wget in bootstrap.conf and set > SKIP_PO=1 if not found. While it 'just works' it also disguises the real > problem and the user might get something unexpected > (non-internationalized wget). Alternatively, you could change the build system so that - 'make'

Re: Wget bootstrapping problem

2020-05-06 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 05.05.20 03:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >>> We could switch the order such that Wget is the default and rsync is used >>> as a >>> fallback >> >> That sounds better than reverting, no? Perhaps you could propose a patch. > > No. From the point of security, "wget as default and