Tim Rühsen wrote:
Just reading this CVE [1] from a week ago, makes me want to
disable all large allocations on the stack.
Yes please. Any chance to remove it from gettext.h ?
#if _LIBGETTEXT_HAVE_VARIABLE_SIZE_ARRAYS
char msg_ctxt_id[msgctxt_len + msgid_len];
#else
It's already removed fr
Bruno Haible wrote:
How about making use of this GNULIB_NO_VLA macro in all places that assume
VLA syntax?
That's OK for allocating VLAs, but it's too broad for vla.h since vla.h does not
allocate VLAs and its uses of variable-length arrays do not have the security or
performance issues that
Decouple these modules from c-strtod. Nowadays it’s reasonable to
assume the C99 signatures for strtod and strtold. Programs that
require stricter adherence to C99 should also use the strtod and
strtold modules as needed, and we no longer need the
HAVE_C99_STRTOLD macro.
* NEWS: Mention this.
* l
Hi Colin,
> Without this, we get "error: 'CHAR_BIT' undeclared".
>
> * tests/test-array_map.c: Include .
> * tests/test-hash_map.c: Likewise.
> * tests/test-linkedhash_map.c: Likewise.
Thanks. Applied.
Bruno
Without this, we get "error: 'CHAR_BIT' undeclared".
* tests/test-array_map.c: Include .
* tests/test-hash_map.c: Likewise.
* tests/test-linkedhash_map.c: Likewise.
---
tests/test-array_map.c | 1 +
tests/test-hash_map.c | 1 +
tests/test-linkedhash_map.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 inse
