doc: tweak markup of module names

2018-07-23 Thread Bruno Haible
2018-07-23 Bruno Haible doc: For module names, use texinfo markup @code{} or @samp{}. * doc/alloca.texi: Mark gnulib module names with @code. * doc/alloca-opt.texi: Likewise. * doc/quote.texi: Likewise. * doc/posix-functions/freopen.texi: Likewise.

Re: avoid some overfull lines in gnulib.pdf

2018-07-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Werner, > The attached patch fixes all overfull lines except the ones caused by > overlong URLs. Thanks! Applied. > I hope using @inlinefmt (introduced 2013 in version 5.0) is OK. Sure. Bruno

Re: Adding strfmon(3) to Gnulib?

2018-07-23 Thread John Zaitseff
Hi, Paul, > Thanks for volunteering to do that. I guess that's how it works, doesn't it :-) > Glibc strfmon would be preferred; ideally with no changes if > possible. That's also my preference, as it then makes it easier to update if Glibc does. > Also, assuming you write a nontrivial amount o

Re: Adding strfmon(3) to Gnulib?

2018-07-23 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks for volunteering to do that. Glibc strfmon would be preferred; ideally with no changes if possible. I suggest using Git to prepare your patches, using 'git format-patch' and then 'git send-email' to send them. Also, assuming you write a nontrivial amount of glue in m4/whatever.m4 etc., yo

avoid some overfull lines in gnulib.pdf

2018-07-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The attached patch fixes all overfull lines except the ones caused by overlong URLs.[*] I've tested it with texinfo 6.5 – I hope using @inlinefmt (introduced 2013 in version 5.0) is OK. Werner [*] The @url command produces overfull lines even if within a @raggedright environment. I c

Adding strfmon(3) to Gnulib?

2018-07-23 Thread John Zaitseff
Hi, all, I've done a quick search of the Gnulib discussion list archives and have not seen this issue raised: Is it worth adding strfmon(3) and possibly strfmon_l(3) for those systems that do not have it? I'm thinking primarily OpenBSD, even the latest version. This OS does not have either. I