On 08/05/18 09:40, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Libvirt CI recently started running "make check" on our FreeBSD 10 & 11
> hosts, and we see frequent failure of the test-poll unit test in gnulib
> IIUC, gnulib is not actually building a replacement poll() function
> on FreeBSD, it is merely running
Hi Tim,
> This loop is in gnulib code, lib/Makefile.am (L263, ff. here).
I don't see such loops in a typical Makefile.am generated by gnulib-tool.
Can you attach the Makefile.am and Makefile.in, please?
Bruno
On 05/14/2018 10:24 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Tim Rühsen wrote:
>> I am not an expert here
> Neither am I. This would better be a topic for the help-make or bug-make
> mailing
> list, I guess.
Bruno,
why do you think this is a make issue ?
This loop is in gnulib code, lib/Makefile.am (L263, ff.
On 14/05/18 01:28, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> Why are you removing fflush (stdout) from the test without any explanation?
>
> Yes, fflush(stdout) statements are extremely important if you want to
> understand/debug test failures on native Windows.
Oops, I wasn't aware of windows
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Why are you removing fflush (stdout) from the test without any explanation?
Yes, fflush(stdout) statements are extremely important if you want to
understand/debug test failures on native Windows.
Bruno
Tim Rühsen wrote:
> I am not an expert here
Neither am I. This would better be a topic for the help-make or bug-make mailing
list, I guess.
Bruno
On Monday, May 14, 2018 3:51:02 AM CEST Pádraig Brady wrote:
> @@ -122,9 +139,10 @@ main (void)
> perror_exit (base, 6);
>while ((e = fts_read (ftsp)))
> needles_seen += strcmp (e->fts_name, "needle") == 0;
> - fflush (stdout);
>if (errno)
> perror_exit ("fts_read", 7);
> +
