On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 21:48:34 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
>
> > - if (dfa_supported (d))
> > -{
> > - dfaoptimize (d);
> > - dfaanalyze (d, searchflag);
> > -}
> > - else
> > -{
> > - d->dfaexec = dfaexec_noop;
> > -}
> > -
> > - if (d->supe
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
- if (dfa_supported (d))
-{
- dfaoptimize (d);
- dfaanalyze (d, searchflag);
-}
- else
-{
- d->dfaexec = dfaexec_noop;
-}
-
- if (d->superset)
-{
- d->fast = true;
- dfaanalyze (d->superset, searchflag);
-}
+ d->dfaexec
Hi,
A case that dfa is slower than regex on bug-gawk mailing list is
discussed 4 months ago.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gawk/2017-07/msg2.html
Although gawk is fixed to not use dfa in some cases, it looks like a
temporary treatment. (11d4ea518166ffbc0c2fe85d090723e8f299486c)
