Zack Weinberg wrote:
Do you think you could come up with matching patches for glibc? For
this, and for the __nonnull thing. I'm not going to have time this
week.
I could, but I was sort of hoping that you could handle the glibc side while I
did the gnulib side. :-) There's no rush.
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> I was being
>> consistent with the existing getopt_int.h - maybe that should be
>> renamed too?
>
> Maybe, but let's defer that as it's a separable change and it's to a
> longstanding file name. For now I just renamed the
Zack Weinberg wrote:
I was being
consistent with the existing getopt_int.h - maybe that should be
renamed too?
Maybe, but let's defer that as it's a separable change and it's to a
longstanding file name. For now I just renamed the new files, using the attached
Gnulib patch.
>From f78aadac0f73
Zack Weinberg wrote:
This patch is incomplete.
Yes, it was the Emacs patch, not the Gnulib patch. I'll attach a complete Gnulib
patch.
If gnulib cannot use __nonnull in
getopt_{core,ext}.h, then there is no point trying to define it in
getopt_cdefs.h.
Good point, I've removed that in the
