Re: z/OS perror test failures due to quirky error handling

2017-03-01 Thread Daniel Richard G.
On Wed, 2017 Mar 1 00:48+0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > It tests against numbers in order to catch low-quality implementations that > produce just "error 12". Here's a proposed patch. Please test. > > --- a/tests/test-perror.sh > +++ b/tests/test-perror.sh [...] Works for me. test-perror.sh now

Re: z/OS sigpipe test failures due to quirky error handling

2017-03-01 Thread Daniel Richard G.
On Wed, 2017 Mar 1 00:54+0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > I would argue that this behaviour is not POSIX compliant. Quoting the > POSIX standard [1]: > > Signal: SIGPIPE > Default action: T > > The default actions are as follows: > T > Abnormal termination of the process. > A >