On 14 August 2015 at 11:30, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I just don't want
>> a GPLv3-licensed file in the git repo and an integrated part
>> of our build-and-test system...
>
>
> My kneejerk reaction is that the build procedures in question are large
> enough that they should stay
Peter Maydell wrote:
I just don't want
a GPLv3-licensed file in the git repo and an integrated part
of our build-and-test system...
My kneejerk reaction is that the build procedures in question are large enough
that they should stay GPLv3. If you don't want those files in your git repo you
c
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:39:48PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 August 2015 at 19:27, Eric Blake wrote:
> > It's worth asking the gnulib folks for an opinion on whether relaxing
> > the license on maint.mk and GNUmakefile to explicitly go back to GPLv2+,
> > and/or explicitly add some expli
