On 06/15/2014 06:53 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Actually, it occurs to me that the result still uses TIME_MAX and, if
> not guarded,
> still conflicts with glibc's claim to a new name. I still think that
> "implementations"
> need an unambiguously distinct name space. *_MAX is too greedy.
Ah, don't
On 06/14/14 14:37, Bruce Korb wrote:
On 06/11/14 15:46, Jim Meyering wrote:
I wrote the patch, and tested by running this:
./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/tmp/x --with-tests --test
parse-duration
Excellent. Please push it, thank you!
Actually, it occurs to me that the result stil
