On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:44:35AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 8 January 2014 05:59, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > I think that the following change to Gnulib would clarify. I
> > have not actually tested the shell code it suggests, although I
> > probably should. Will you take a look at it?
> >
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:36:39AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 8 January 2014 06:01, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Reuben Thomas writes:
> >
> > > On 22 November 2013 00:24, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21 November 2013 23:50, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > I just realised that
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:09:45AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 8 January 2014 06:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Reuben Thomas writes:
> >
> > > The attached patch adds a module relocatable-perl that does for Perl
> > > scripts what relocatable-script does for shell scripts.
> >
> > It looks to
Hi,
sorry for the early post, I should be reading the whole thread first.
This fixed all open issues for me.
Best regards
— Dago
Am 08.01.2014 um 06:49 schrieb Paul Eggert :
> And Jim pointed out a bug in that patch, so I pushed the following
> further patch into grep (with the init.sh part
On 8 January 2014 06:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Reuben Thomas writes:
>
> > The attached patch adds a module relocatable-perl that does for Perl
> > scripts what relocatable-script does for shell scripts.
>
> It looks to me like it's successfully in the same spirit as the
> shell implementation. I
On 8 January 2014 05:59, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I think that the following change to Gnulib would clarify. I
> have not actually tested the shell code it suggests, although I
> probably should. Will you take a look at it?
>
> diff --git a/doc/relocatable-maint.texi b/doc/relocatable-maint.texi
> in
On 8 January 2014 06:01, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Reuben Thomas writes:
>
> > On 22 November 2013 00:24, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >
> > On 21 November 2013 23:50, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I just realised that I never had this working properly, and I track
> the
> > problem all the way
