Reuben Thomas wrote:
It seems to me that since commit e3834e1ce49, func_tmpdir has no callers,
and can be removed.
Thanks, I removed it.
About to make a grep release, I hit the seemingly-spurious failure of
the public-submodule-commit rule. It ended up being due to the
version (built from git.git) of git I was using on that system.
I haven't traced the change to a precise git version, but did confirm
that 1.7.10.2 and 1.8.1.4 both
Hi Paul,
On Jan 2, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> it looks like doing so effectively deprecates Solaris 7 support
>
> That's fine. Sun (now Oracle) stopped supporting Solaris 7
> in August 2008. Even Solaris 8 is fair game now; its end of
> support was March
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
it looks like doing so effectively deprecates Solaris 7 support
That's fine. Sun (now Oracle) stopped supporting Solaris 7
in August 2008. Even Solaris 8 is fair game now; its end of
support was March 2012. (Solaris 9's end of support will be
in October of this year.)
Hi Jim,
On Jan 2, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> One of our tenets relating to developer-related tools/rules like this
> is that we do not accommodate inferior tools when it comes to building
> from git-cloned sources (by contrast to building from a tarball).
> People who do that are exp
Hi Paul,
Some time ago, with regard to my bootstrap rewrite, you suggested that the
hoop-jumping I do to find a backslash-friendly echo equivalent on the
host machine was probably overkill nowadays, and that it would be cleaner
to just use `printf '%s\n'` everywhere.
The bs_echo boilerplate in bo
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> On Jan 2, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> ...
>>> The change (back ticks instead of $(...) in the no-submodule-changes rule
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the quick response.
On Jan 2, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> ...
>> The change (back ticks instead of $(...) in the no-submodule-changes rule)
>> looks like a harmless way to fix the bug to me.
>>
>> Okay to
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Replacing the $(...) with back ticks fixes the parse problem for me, though I'm
not sure whether it's the odd looking dangling `|| exit 1` or the POSIX command
substitution paren matching interacting badly with nested `cd $(srcdir)`?
Neither sounds plausible, so I'm afr
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
...
> The change (back ticks instead of $(...) in the no-submodule-changes rule)
> looks like a harmless way to fix the bug to me.
>
> Okay to push?
Hi Gary,
I have been unable to reproduce that failure so far.
E.g., this via grep (which I h
Gnulibbers,
On my Mac OS 10.9.1, with /bin/zsh as my login shell (trying to make an alpha
release of Libtool master HEAD):
$ make --version
GNU Make 3.81
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not eve
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/ to the bug-gnulib mailing list page?
Sounds good. I made that change and a few more.
Thanks,
Karl
It's a small thing, but could we please have a link from
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/ to the bug-gnulib mailing list page?
It's a small help for finding the archives, options pages &c.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
On 1 January 2014 13:13, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> The Perl code is also rather shorter and probably more robust.
>
And also much clearer in intent, which makes it a better starting point for
other similar modules for other languages, particularly those that can't
reuse relocatable-script. It would
The attached patch adds a module relocatable-perl that does for Perl
scripts what relocatable-script does for shell scripts.
(In a previous message, I pointed out that relocatable-script can be
used for Perl. While this is true, it's a somewhat delicate hack,
requires an extra fork, and doesn't wo
On 01/01/2014 12:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> * lib/version-etc.c (COPYRIGHT_YEAR): Bump to 2014.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
> ---
>
> It's that time again :)
Patch 2/2 was (rightfully) rejected in the moderator queue as oversized
(1.9 meg); here's the relevant details:
I ran 'make update-co
16 matches
Mail list logo