Re: test-fdutimensat racy?

2013-06-04 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 06/04/2013 09:20 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 05/22/2013 12:18 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> A new patch follows below. I also added a note about the maximum >> delay as Padraig suggested. > > I changed nap()'s limit for nanosleep from 20 to the correct > number (2^31-1), and adde

Re: test-fdutimensat racy?

2013-06-04 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 05/22/2013 12:18 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > A new patch follows below. I also added a note about the maximum > delay as Padraig suggested. I changed nap()'s limit for nanosleep from 20 to the correct number (2^31-1), and added a Changelog entry, as well as rebasing against latest Gi

Re: sig2str and str2sig use in C++

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel J Sebald
On 06/04/2013 02:47 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: () Paul Eggert () Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:28:24 -0700 extern char const allsigstr[]; This would consist of a concatenation of null-terminated strings, one per name, terminated by an empty string. [compile time wins] I seem to recall

Re: sig2str and str2sig use in C++

2013-06-04 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Paul Eggert () Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:28:24 -0700 extern char const allsigstr[]; This would consist of a concatenation of null-terminated strings, one per name, terminated by an empty string. [compile time wins] I seem to recall a paper several years back that argued against this a