On 10/25/2012 08:15 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> This has been asked before on this list, and the answer has always been
>> that it is more work than worth the effort, and that gnulib-tool is the
>> preferred way to use gnulib source code.
>>
>
> I cannot really understand your reasoning as it mak
Am 25.10.2012 16:02, schrieb Eric Blake:
On 10/25/2012 07:52 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Are you using 'gnulib-tool --lgpl=2 --import poll' to get at the module?
Hello,
I didn't use that tool. Following my intuition I just browsed the source
code as normal, which gave me poll.c under GPLv2+[1].
On 10/25/2012 07:52 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> Are you using 'gnulib-tool --lgpl=2 --import poll' to get at the module?
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> I didn't use that tool. Following my intuition I just browsed the source
> code as normal, which gave me poll.c under GPLv2+[1].
Indeed - in gnulib, we pref
Am 25.10.2012 00:05, schrieb Eric Blake:
On 10/24/2012 04:00 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Dear folks,
I am on a mission to port Pulseaudio (PA) to Windows. PA relies heavily
on poll() and this is not properly implemented for Windows. I foun
Hello,
In trying to compile mbrtowc.c on LynxOS 178, I got an error because
EILSEQ is not defined. Indeed, the system itself is too old, and is
missing that definition.
Initially, I tried to find a way that would be completely generic:
Check errno.h and do nothing if found. Otherwise, check wchar
