Re: [PATCH] GNUmakefile: reenable "make syntax-check" for most projects

2011-10-30 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Jim, On 31 Oct 2011, at 04:25, Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, I've just pushed the following fix. > > I share blame, as the reviewer. > I did not test Friday's change until today. > > Since Friday's commit 05e2d798, "maint.mk: don't maintain a second > build-aux variable", "syntax-check" would do

Re: Build errors on IRIX 5.3 - ffsl

2011-10-30 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello, Tom G. Christensen wrote: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DNO_XMALLOC > -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I../intl -I/usr/ > tgcware/include -g -O2 -MT ffsl.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o ffsl.o > ffsl.c &&\ > mv -f $depbase.Tpo $d

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitlog-to-changelog output adjustments

2011-10-30 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:19:43PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: [...] > > gitlog-to-changelog: terminate the 1st line of commit message with a dot [...] > I see where you're coming from, and if you make each summary line > start with a capital letter, like a regular sentence, then that makes >

[PATCH] GNUmakefile: reenable "make syntax-check" for most projects

2011-10-30 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, I've just pushed the following fix. I share blame, as the reviewer. I did not test Friday's change until today. >From a765077b04a89bffa2a6095c7988fb9a70857d7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:24:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] GNUmakefile: reenable "make synta

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitlog-to-changelog output adjustments

2011-10-30 Thread Jim Meyering
Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > After migrating several projects from GNU-Style ChangeLogs to git with > autogenerated ChangeLog files, I found a minor discrepancy in style Hi Dmitry, If they're using gnulib but not listed in users.txt, please add their names/URLs. Keeping that list up to date helps us

Re: [PATCH] test-parse-datetime.c: avoid new DST-related false positive test failure

2011-10-30 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > With last night's time switch here (from CEST to CST), > I noticed that coreutils' "make check" would fail like this: > > test-parse-datetime.c:142: assertion failed > > Fixed with this: > > Subject: [PATCH] test-parse-datetime.c: avoid new DST-related false positive > test

[PATCH] test-parse-datetime.c: avoid new DST-related false positive test failure

2011-10-30 Thread Jim Meyering
With last night's time switch here (from CEST to CST), I noticed that coreutils' "make check" would fail like this: test-parse-datetime.c:142: assertion failed Fixed with this: >From 56ddf0fdeb52ce76718e0594db4f567401e90a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18