Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

2011-09-29 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/26/2011 6:00 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > It is normal that --enable-relocatable has a runtime cost. Certainly when > you apply --enable-relocatable to small, fast programs like 'id' or 'pwd' > the runtime cost will be more perceivable than with programs which run > for longer than 1 second on av

Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

2011-09-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bruno, On 29 Sep 2011, at 16:14, Bruno Haible wrote: >> I'm still curious why gnulib doesn't try to put the compiler into >> c99 mode when the client project has chosen some gnulib c99 compliance >> modules? After all, it might be that with the compiler in c99 mode >> fewer of the gnulib modul

Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

2011-09-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bruno, On 29 Sep 2011, at 16:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >>> we're fine as-is, since it's normal practice >>> to put the AC_PROG_CC_STDC before gl_EARLY. >> >> I discovered the multiple --std=gnu99 option problem because no >> one told me that it's normal to to put AC_PROG

Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

2011-09-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 29 Sep 2011, at 16:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Autoconf makes it easy to enforce and document these kinds of order > > dependencies though: > > > > AC_DEFUN([gl_EARLY], [ > > ... > > AC_BEFORE([$0], [AC_PROG_CC_C99]) > > ... > > ]) > > Rather, the order should be that

Re: test-float fails on regular PowerPC, too.

2011-09-29 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Andreas Metzler wrote on 2011-09-05: > > > test-float fails on PowerPC (not PowerPC64), too. This causes > [...] > > Does the test failure go away if you change in lib/float.in.h the > > condition > > > (defined _ARCH_PPC || defined _POWER) && defined _AIX > > > to > > > (defined _A

Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

2011-09-29 Thread Paul Eggert
On 09/29/11 02:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > But switching the compiler to a different standards-compliance > mode is a global effect. I was not sure whether it would have some negative > side effects on some platforms. > > On the other hand, we do it in module 'stdarg' for 5 years now, and it has > n

Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

2011-09-29 Thread Bruno Haible
[Dropping bug-autoconf from CC] Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > we're fine as-is, since it's normal practice > > to put the AC_PROG_CC_STDC before gl_EARLY. > > I discovered the multiple --std=gnu99 option problem because no > one told me that it's normal to to put AC_PROG_CC_STDC before > gl_EARLY, I