Libvirt was mistakenly using instead of "intprops.h"
in one place; when I fixed that, I was surprised to get a
syntax-check failure from an unused header.
* top/maint.mk (_sc_header_without_use): Check both include
styles.
(sc_prohibit_assert_without_use)
(sc_prohibit_close_stream_without_use)
(s
Eric Blake wrote:
> This syntax check needs to reflect commit 8cc0fee and following.
>
> * top/maint.mk (_intprops_names): Match recent changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
> ---
>
> I found this by accident when 'make syntax-check' started failing
> on libvirt due to a single use of INT_MULTIPL
This syntax check needs to reflect commit 8cc0fee and following.
* top/maint.mk (_intprops_names): Match recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
I found this by accident when 'make syntax-check' started failing
on libvirt due to a single use of INT_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW.
ChangeLog|5
Eric Blake wrote:
> --- a/lib/strerror-override.c
> +++ b/lib/strerror-override.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ strerror_override (int errnum)
> /* These error messages are taken from glibc/sysdeps/gnu/errlist.c. */
> switch (errnum)
> {
> +#if REPLACE_STRERROR_0
> + case 0:
> + return "
Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Bruno's comment (in the text you elided) suggests intent to have
>> pathmax.h leave PATH_MAX undefined on the Hurd:
>>
>> >> I find it reasonable to use "#ifdef PATH_MAX" in front of every use of
>> >> PATH_MAX, like POSIX requires.
>>
>> With such a change, each of the a
