Re: Dealing with character ranges in grep

2011-06-14 Thread Aharon Robbins
Hi. > From: Paolo Bonzini > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:11:32 +0200 > Subject: Re: Dealing with character ranges in grep > To: Aharon Robbins > Cc: egg...@cs.ucla.edu, k...@freefriends.org, bug-g...@gnu.org, > bug-gnulib@gnu.org > > > ? In principle, I'm all for this, but in practice, I'm

[PATCH] init.sh: give more portable redirection-related advice in a comment

2011-06-14 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, >From 6a187a7651ab88e940f5e722fc6ccf754742b3ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:33:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] init.sh: give more portable redirection-related advice in a comment * tests/init.sh (stderr_fileno_): Update the advice in comments. See http://

test-nonblocking-pipe and test-poll-h failures

2011-06-14 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, I'm seeing spurious test failures of test-nonblocking-pipe.sh on several of Debian's autobuilders, e.g. from the latest build: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libvirt&arch=sparc&ver=0.9.2-4&stamp=1307995994 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libvirt&arch=mipsel&ver=0

Re: Dealing with character ranges in grep

2011-06-14 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Karl Berry (k...@freefriends.org) [20110611 01:50]: > Because whatever changes they might or might not agree to make, they > obviously won't reach user systems for years. Not necessarily. Linux distributors do backports of changes they deem good to have now and then. Philipp

Re: Dealing with character ranges in grep

2011-06-14 Thread Paolo Bonzini
>   In principle, I'm all for this, but in practice, I'm going to leave gawk's >   code alone for now (there's always 4.1 :-). As long as --posix is not affecting the choice, that's fine. However, please make sure that compiling gawk --without-included-regex works (it should go without saying)!