Re: Update known compiler switches for Fortran and OpenMP macros.

2011-03-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ moving from autoconf-patches ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:46:00PM CET: > This patch is my current known set of updates for existing Fortran > macros. [...] I'm syncing the part below to gnulib. Thanks, Ralf Update AC_OPENMP macro for Lahey compiler on GNU/Linux.

Re: Testsuite of libidn 1.20 fails in gnulib

2011-03-04 Thread Paul Eggert
That problem is occurring because libidn is using an old version of gnulib's m4/longlong.m4. This bug was fixed on 2007-11-12 in gnulib. Time to upgrade, I expect. Plus, the libidn maintainers might consider upgrading from gnulib regularly, before doing a libidn release.

Re: Testsuite of libidn 1.20 fails in gnulib

2011-03-04 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Eric, Am 04.03.2011 um 21:30 schrieb Eric Blake: > On 03/04/2011 01:21 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to compile libidn 1.20 on Solaris 9 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 >> and I get a failing test in the gnulib-part (cc'ed bug-gnulib@ for this): >> >>> DEPDIR=.deps depmode=

Re: Testsuite of libidn 1.20 fails in gnulib

2011-03-04 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/04/2011 01:21 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to compile libidn 1.20 on Solaris 9 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 > and I get a failing test in the gnulib-part (cc'ed bug-gnulib@ for this): > >> DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../../build-aux/depcomp \ >> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/

Testsuite of libidn 1.20 fails in gnulib

2011-03-04 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi, I am trying to compile libidn 1.20 on Solaris 9 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 and I get a failing test in the gnulib-part (cc'ed bug-gnulib@ for this): > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../../build-aux/depcomp \ > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DIN_LIBIDN_GNULIB_TESTS=1 >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] sendfd, recvf pass file descriptors along Unix domain sockets

2011-03-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/03/2011 10:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote: I just createdhttp://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12539 - it would be nice if the kernel and glibc would give us a way to atomically set the FD_CLOEXEC flag on fd's created by recvfd. But even without atomic support from the kernel, it would