On 2/28/2011 5:23 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder. Three weeks ago, I concentrated on discussing the
> support of UCS-4 characters (still working on that). I've added minor tweaks
> (especially so as to avoid mixing the Win32 and the Cygwin approach), and
> committed this:
Thanks
On 02/28/2011 02:00 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
I find it preferrable to commit independent
changes as separate commits; it makes things clearer when analyzing
the history later.
OK, thanks; I did that.
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Make syntax-check complains about this in localcharset.c:
>
> if (old_res_ptr != NULL)
> free (old_res_ptr);
>
> maint.mk: found useless "if" before "free" above
I wouldn't use this rule in general, because whether th
Hi Chuck,
> Ping?
Thanks for the reminder. Three weeks ago, I concentrated on discussing the
support of UCS-4 characters (still working on that). I've added minor tweaks
(especially so as to avoid mixing the Win32 and the Cygwin approach), and
committed this:
2011-02-28 Corinna Vinschen(ti
Hi Paul,
> Here's a proposed patch to simplify stdio so that, for example,
> Emacs and coreutils won't need m4/asm-underscore.m4 or
> lib/stdio-write.c.
The patch is fine and good.
But actually it's two different, independent changes (even though they
have the same motivation). I find it preferr
Make syntax-check complains about this in localcharset.c:
if (old_res_ptr != NULL)
free (old_res_ptr);
maint.mk: found useless "if" before "free" above
Any objections to simplifying this to 'free (old_res_ptr);'?
/Simon
