On 9 Oct 2010, at 04:56, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hey Gary,
Howdy Bruce,
> (re-send -- I didn't see the first one show up on bug-gnulib list.)
Me neither.
> On 09/26/08 20:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Long ago, far away and years ago, that is *precisely* the point I was
>>> making. (Remember the a
* lib/time.in.h (__time_t_must_be_integral): Detect any
problematic systems, allowing the rest of gnulib to assume POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
> > oppose a patch that adds a compile-time verification in gnulib's
> > that time_t is integral on all platforms that we support,
> > given th
Hey Gary,
(re-send -- I didn't see the first one show up on bug-gnulib list.)
On 09/26/08 20:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Long ago, far away and years ago, that is *precisely* the point I was
>> making. (Remember the autotool bake-off contest?)
>
> I remember it well. Code Sourcery.
> The thin
Hi Jim,
> This isn't a show-stopper for the coreutils release.
But it's easy to fix. The bug is actually in the gnulib replacement, which
is missing a check on the validity of the argument.
2010-10-08 Bruno Haible
nanosleep: Make replacement POSIX compliant.
* lib/nanosleep.
Hi Scott,
> I have opened a handful of tickets in Haiku's trac to cover them:
>
> http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6704
> http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6705
> http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6706
> http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6707
Nice. For the unsetenv one, you can also attach the test program
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
Hi Bruno,
>> This isn't a show-stopper for the coreutils release.
>
> But it's easy to fix. The bug is actually in the gnulib replacement, which
> is missing a check on the validity of the argument.
>
>
> 2010-10-08 Bruno Haible
>
> nanosleep: Make replaceme
Hey Gary,
On 09/26/08 20:34, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Long ago, far away and years ago, that is *precisely* the point I was
>> making. (Remember the autotool bake-off contest?)
>
> I remember it well. Code Sourcery.
> The thing that struck me a few days ago was that gnulib actually provides
>
> 2010-10-06 Bruno Haible
>
> string, sys_select: Avoid #including large headers unless necessary.
> * lib/string.in.h: Don't include except on NetBSD.
> * lib/sys_select.in.h: Don't include except on Solaris,
> OSF/1, BeOS, Haiku.
> Reported by Jim Meyering.
Oo
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 04:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
>>>
>>> I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
>>
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I thought I'd try out reformatting lines to make them more readable on
> other projects first, before doing further changes to gnulib along
> these lines, as there seems to be some controversy about it and it's
> better to get some experience with it. However, some files are
>
FYI,
In this part of test-nanosleep.c, on OpenBSD 4.7,
nanosleep ends up sleeping the 10 seconds before returning 0.
Wrong on both counts. It shouldn't sleep at all, and it should
have returned -1.
int
main (void)
{
struct timespec ts;
ts.tv_sec = 10;
ts.tv_nsec = -1;
errn
* build-aux/bootstrap (gnulib_mk_hook): New function, so that
the Bison bootstrapping process can rewrite file names and variables
in this file before later parts of 'bootstrap' use the file.
Bison wants to include lib/gnulib.mk from the top-level makefile,
so it needs the file names in this file t
I thought I'd try out reformatting lines to make them more readable on
other projects first, before doing further changes to gnulib along
these lines, as there seems to be some controversy about it and it's
better to get some experience with it. However, some files are
shared, and the gnulib versi
* doc/posix-functions/cacos.texi (cacos): Added after cygwin
1.7.7.
* doc/posix-functions/cacosf.texi (cacosf): Likewise.
* doc/posix-functions/cacosh.texi (cacosh): Likewise.
* doc/posix-functions/cacoshf.texi (cacoshf): Likewise.
* doc/posix-functions/carg.texi (carg): Likewise.
* doc/posix-funct
On 10/01/2010 04:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
tightened to integral in light of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
