Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer

I attach a patch-set which performs all my promised tidy-up of regex.texi, with the exception of the removal of POSIX documentation, which I will submit later. Note that this set supercedes the previous two patches I supplied: to be precise, the second patch has changed slightly, as I found a typo

[PATCH] missing deps in unistr/

Hi, Several of the unistr/u{8,16}-str* modules fail the test suite due to missing dependencies on unistr/u32-to-u{8,16}. Patch attached. cheers, Ian. -- Ian Beckwith - i...@erislabs.net - http://erislabs.net/ianb/ GPG fingerprint: AF6C C0F1 1E74 424B BCD5 4814 40EC C154 A8BA C1EA Listening t