-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ben Pfaff on 9/14/2009 8:42 PM:
>
> I'm arguing that the second program should also report "No such
> file or directory".
Ah, so for 'foo/', the code should distinguish between ENOENT and ENOTDIR,
based on whether 'foo' exists. I'll upd
Eric Blake writes:
> According to Ben Pfaff on 9/14/2009 5:51 PM:
>>> + /* Mingw remove("file/") fails with EINVAL, instead of the required
>>> + ENOTDIR. */
>>> + if (ISSLASH (name[len - 1]))
>>> +{
>>> + errno = ENOTDIR;
>>> + return -1;
>>> +}
>>
>> I believe that thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ben Pfaff on 9/14/2009 5:51 PM:
>> + /* Mingw remove("file/") fails with EINVAL, instead of the required
>> + ENOTDIR. */
>> + if (ISSLASH (name[len - 1]))
>> +{
>> + errno = ENOTDIR;
>> + return -1;
>> +}
>
> I b
Eric Blake writes:
> + if (lstat (name, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR (st.st_mode))
> +{
> + /* Mingw rmdir("empty/.") mistakenly succeeds. */
> + while (ISSLASH (name[len - 1]))
> +len--;
> + if (name[len - 1] == '.' && (1 == len || ISSLASH (name[len - 2])))
> +{
> +
mingw remove() complies with C89, but not with POSIX. I'll be committing this
shortly (actually, first I probably need to commit a stat module, to make up
for the fact that both mingw rmdir("dir") and rmdir("dir/") can succeed, even
when one of stat("dir") and stat("dir/") fails, depending on w
--- - 2009-09-14 14:32:58.934253776 +0200
+++ in 2009-09-14 14:32:58.930840392 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-12131415.16 13 1260713716 Sun Dec 13 14:15:16 2009
-12131415.16 13 1260713716 Sun Dec 13 14:15:16 2009
-0101.00 13 -62167219200 Sat Jan
This patch is to make it so touch -t works with a time stamp
ending in ".60". Without this change, "touch -t 200901010800.60 file"
would fail. Note that the change below makes a recursive call to
posixtime. That may not be the most efficient, but I suspect this
case is relatively unusual and I'd
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:22:56AM CEST:
>> On 09/08/2009 10:25 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >I wanted this change in vc-dwim, since it doesn't use autoheader:
>> >I'd rather skip autoheader than add an unnecessary AC_CONFIG_HEADERS.
>>
>> Although obsol
