Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10

2009-02-10 Thread Jim Meyering
Mike Frysinger wrote: ... >> > i was thinking a common change to the version-etc module to add a >> > "packager" field rather than having every package out there allow people >> > to tweak PACKAGE_NAME. what do you think of that ? >> >> Sounds sensible. >> The question then becomes whether to cha

Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10

2009-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 15:10:59 Jim Meyering wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 06 February 2009 01:13:13 Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> >> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 03:28:58 Jim Meyering wrote: > >> >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> >

Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10

2009-02-10 Thread Jim Meyering
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 06 February 2009 01:13:13 Jim Meyering wrote: >> Pádraig Brady wrote: >> > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 03:28:58 Jim Meyering wrote: >> >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Friday 23 January 2009 09:35:54 Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >

Re: winsock: needs access to SOCKET in application code

2009-02-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible writes: > Simon, > >> +/* This function is useful it you create a socket using gnulib's >> + Winsock wrappers but needs to pass on the socket handle to some >> + other library that only accepts sockets. */ >> +#if WINDOWS_SOCKETS >> +static inline SOCKET >> +gl_fd_to_handle (int