"Brendan O'Dea" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've just done that with a message to bug-help2man,
>> but don't see a list. Maybe it's just an alias.
>
> It is just an alias.
>
>> Similarly, I looked for the upstream source of the script,
>> but didn't find it.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've just done that with a message to bug-help2man,
> but don't see a list. Maybe it's just an alias.
It is just an alias.
> Similarly, I looked for the upstream source of the script,
> but didn't find it.
The source repository is currentl
Jim Meyering writes:
> I've just done that with a message to bug-help2man,
> but don't see a list. Maybe it's just an alias.
>From /etc/aliases on fencepost:
bug-help2man: b...@debian.org
bugs-help2man: bug-help2man
help2man-bug: bug-help2man
help2man-bugs: bug-help2man
--
"Im
k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) wrote:
...
> What will it take to get these modifications back upstream, so that
> everyone can benefit from a new release of help2man?
>
> I pinged Brendan (help2man maintainer, bod at debian) fairly recently
> about making a new release (GPLv3 etc.), and
Martin Lambers writes:
> On Mon, 02. Feb 2009, 22:27:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Simon, Paolo, do you have any comments on the patches suggested in this
>> > thread?
>>
>> I didn't see anything wrong -- on the contrary. If you resend it, I'll
>> apply it.
>
> OK, I resend the part that
Aharon,
> I forgot to mention that you should use the dfa.[ch] in the gawk-stable
> CVS on Savannah. This is the most up to date version.
Thanks. That's the one I took, luckily.
Bruno
