Re: getdate.y fails to compile on QNX 6

2008-01-13 Thread Paul Eggert
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > , which is still present in the latest Gnulib sources. time_t is > equivalent to an unsigned long, which causes both of the comparisons > to fail. It looks like someone has to port getdate.y to QNX 6, then. Do you have the time to do that? QNX 6 is cert

Re: Issues with mountlist.c and fsusage.c

2008-01-13 Thread Paul Eggert
Thomas Guyot-Sionnest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. When using get_fs_usage on FreeBSD with a partition filled over 100% > (this can happen when disk usage grows beyond what's available to normal > users), fsu_bavail becomes insanely high. It's wrapped around. coreutils+gnulib deals with this

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Elias Pipping
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:30:55PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Here's his report (the message I was replying > > to, on bug-coreutils), including verbose logs: > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs/12292 > > OK, test-frexpl.c:137 and test-printf-frexpl.c:96. Then wh

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Elias Pipping
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Jim Meyering wrote: > > [cc'ing bug-gnulib, since the test-*frexpl failures come from gnulib] > > > FAIL: test-frexpl > > > FAIL: test-printf-frexpl > > > > Maybe someone else (Bruno Haible?) will look into t

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Elias, > > Please also show the contents of (in /usr/include, I assume) > > I've attached float.h > ... > % gcc -Ilib buz.c > % ./a.out > LDBL_MANT_DIG = 64 > LDBL_DIG = 18 > LDBL_MIN_EXP = -16381 > LDBL_MAX_EXP = 16384 > LDBL_MIN_10_EXP = -4931 > LDBL_MAX_10_EXP =

Re: strsignal module

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Colin Watson wrote: > it just occurred to me that there's no real > reason to use the snprintf-posix module here; plain snprintf will do > just fine and is much more lightweight. Yes, sure. > I've attached an updated patch. Thank you. I've applied it. Bruno

Re: strsignal module

2008-01-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > The attached updated patches address your concerns and Paul's > > Thanks; looks better now. Two points still: > > - This code will not compile with C89 compilers on platforms without > threading, due to the

autoupdates and build-aux scripts

2008-01-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl, something in your autoupdate process is sometimes, but not always, corrupting the executable permissions of build-aux/config.{guess,sub}. I've tweaked the bits back on, but it would be nice to find the root cause to this issue. - -- Don't work

glibc header files

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Apropos documentation: The following glibc header files are not documented in the glibc manual: a.out.h aliases.h ar.h byteswap.h endian.h fpu_control.h fts.h ieee754.h ifaddrs.h paths.h resolv.h shadow.h sysexits.h ttyent.h You can take action if you want... Bruno

unsupported locales on OpenBSD 4.0

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
On OpenBSD 4.0, when an unsupported locale is specified, setlocale() succeeds but then nl_langinfo(CODESET) is "646". In this situations, some unit tests fail. This patch works around it. 2008-01-13 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * m4/locale-fr.m4 (gt_LOCALE_FR, gt_LOCALE_FR_UTF8): Ch

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
> Here's his report (the message I was replying > to, on bug-coreutils), including verbose logs: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs/12292 OK, test-frexpl.c:137 and test-printf-frexpl.c:96. Then what's the value of 'i' at the moment when it fails? Bruno

Re: Recommended headers include order

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > | +++ lib/error.h 2008-01-11 01:53:27.0 +0100 > | @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > | > | #ifndef __attribute__ > | /* This feature is available in gcc versions 2.5 and later. */ > | -# if __GNUC__ < 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 5) || > __STRICT_ANSI__ > | +# if __GN

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Jim Meyering wrote: >> [cc'ing bug-gnulib, since the test-*frexpl failures come from gnulib] >> > FAIL: test-frexpl >> > FAIL: test-printf-frexpl >> >> Maybe someone else (Bruno Haible?) will look into this part. >> >> > (*) tested

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Elias, Jim Meyering wrote: > [cc'ing bug-gnulib, since the test-*frexpl failures come from gnulib] > > FAIL: test-frexpl > > FAIL: test-printf-frexpl > > Maybe someone else (Bruno Haible?) will look into this part. > > > (*) tested on powerpc-unknown-openbsd4.2, i386-apple-darwin9.

Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd

2008-01-13 Thread Jim Meyering
[cc'ing bug-gnulib, since the test-*frexpl failures come from gnulib] Elias Pipping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With it, v6.9.92 compiles on the aforementioned platforms -- while the > test suite passes on openbsd, though, on darwin 15 tests fail: ... > I've attached the verbose output. Thank yo