Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> - The implementation was naively quadratic in the worst-case complexity. I
> lifted Bruno's KMP ideas in mbsstr to make it linear+delayed allocation.
> glibc
> still uses the naive implementation - should we file a bug with them to fix
> it?
This is t
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to convert m4 to transparently handle embedded NUL. In the
> process,
> I need to move from strstr to memmem (if m4 were fully i18n already, I would
> instead be moving from mbsstr to the length-based analog of mbsstr that
> tolerates embedded NU
Paul Eggert wrote:
"John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The quick patch that I can do is to move where the #undef of the
_GL_JUST_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_DIRECTORY_H is.
Yes, thanks, that sounds like a reasonable fix. I installed the patch
below: does it work for you?
It will take me a li
I'm trying to convert m4 to transparently handle embedded NUL. In the process,
I need to move from strstr to memmem (if m4 were fully i18n already, I would
instead be moving from mbsstr to the length-based analog of mbsstr that
tolerates embedded NUL - is there such a thing?)
Several issues wi
