On 11 Jun 2007, at 13:24, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:08:53AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
The snprintfv code has not been migrating to gnulib (yet? dormant
project?),
so I have no other choice than using gnulib's vasnprintf.c as code
base.
I ran out of time to work on
Hi Bruno,
On 16 Jun 2007, at 18:53, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote on 2007-06-05:
(This is using test-frexpl.c from gnulib HEAD after your patch
commit)
1.01L = 0X2.051EB851EB851EB851EB851EB8P-1
0.505L = 0X2.051EB851EB851EB851EB851EB8P-2
mantissa = 0X2.051EB851EB851EB8
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouldn't a simple
>
>#include
>#undef chown
>
> have done it as well (assuming 'chown' is defined as a function, not as a
> macro)?
Yes, I guess that would work just as well nowadays.
I suppose I was reflexively worried about older systems that
