Re: dummy: fix for Solaris compiler

2007-03-15 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The 'dummy' module is hardly used in practice, because it gets disabled > as soon as you have at least one gnulib module with an unconditional > lib_SOURCES augmentation. But anyway, it doesn't cost much to choose a > different symbol. I applied this: II

Re: gnulib brought back up to 2007-03-12 state; is that the latest?

2007-03-15 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon, can you please check this change? It's not clear whether you > installed it, or were thinking about installing it. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-03/msg00204.html I did install it, but I have installed it again now. /Simon

Re: dummy: fix for Solaris compiler

2007-03-15 Thread Bruno Haible
James Youngman wrote: > On 3/11/07, Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > + #ifdef __sun > > + /* This declaration ensures that the library will export at least 1 > > symbol. */ > > + int dummy; > > + #else > [...] > > Could we maybe pick an external symbol name that's less likely

Re: glob: compilation error due to 'restrict'

2007-03-15 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > Which fix to choose? Which one is likely to please the glibc developers > > better? > > Let's keep the K&R syntax please. Other glibc developers prefer that > for some obscure reason (for external functions only). Thanks for the advice. I'm applying this: 2007-03-15 Bru

Re: Idea for linked-list

2007-03-15 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > > This function is invoked for each list item that for any reason is > > being removed from the list. Is it possible to do this with the > > linked-list module? Good idea. I'm apply this: 2007-03-15 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * lib/gl_list.h (gl_listelem

Re: gnulib brought back up to 2007-03-12 state; is that the latest?

2007-03-15 Thread Bruno Haible
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The system was completely restored using the backup from Sunday night, > and a partial backup from Monday night (Boston time). Many thanks to the GNU sysadmins for proceeding in a fast, professional way, and ensuring a minimal downtime!! Paul Eggert

Re: gnulib brought back up to 2007-03-12 state; is that the latest?

2007-03-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 3/15/2007 6:18 PM: >> I installed the following patch to bring gnulib back in sync with the >> latest snapshot I have. If I missed something installed after that >> please let me know. The email logs suggest that I caught e

Re: gnulib brought back up to 2007-03-12 state; is that the latest?

2007-03-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Paul Eggert on 3/15/2007 5:04 PM: > Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The system was completely restored using the backup from Sunday night, >> and a partial backup from Monday night (Boston time). > > I installed the foll

gnulib brought back up to 2007-03-12 state; is that the latest?

2007-03-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The system was completely restored using the backup from Sunday night, > and a partial backup from Monday night (Boston time). I installed the following patch to bring gnulib back in sync with the latest snapshot I have. If I missed something install

FYI, savannah still down

2007-03-15 Thread Jim Meyering
In case you're wondering what's wrong with savannah.gnu.org, here's the word from IRC: URL: irc://irc.freenode.net/savannah Topic: The server for savannah.gnu.org has experienced 3 disk failures (out of 6) in 24 hours. Savannah was retrieved from the colocation to transfer the late