and (B) the printf I spent all weekend working on merging?
So far, it's unrelated. snprintfv lets me define my own handler for
%U or similar, but I don't see how to produce UTF-16 or UTF-32 strings
with snprintfv, and how to take UTF-16 or UTF-32 strings as arguments
without dirty casting.
L
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> Hi! Do we need to put link-warning.h in build-aux/? Since it is a C
>> header file, having it in the lib/ directory seems cleaner to me.
>
> The file is not included by the C compiler. It's used by some Makefile rules
> that don't involve
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Could you tell me a little bit about unistdio
It's a set of *printf functions for Unicode strings, part of a Unicode string
library that I presented here: [1]. Its include file unistdio.h is appended.
> and how it interacts with (A) the printf we already have,
The inte
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Do they lack the C99 printf 'a' and 'A' conversion?)
>
> It depends on the compiler and version. For example, SAS/C 7.50
> (April 2004) has 'a' and 'A', but SAS/C 7.00 (April 2001) does not.
OK, a mainframe system with a 6 year old compiler - that's enough of a niche
marke
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this something that should be documented in gnulib, or pushed upstream
> into http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Notices?
The latter, I'd say. Please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and propose
a patch to maintain.texi in context-diff
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:38:55PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> >In the autogen sources it appears to be named SNV_ASSERT_FCN. In the
> >libsnprintfv repository, it's named SNV_ASSERT_FMT - just grep for it.
> >Which one should it be? Can't have half and half.
>
> FCN seems more meaningful.
In the autogen sources it appears to be named SNV_ASSERT_FCN. In the
libsnprintfv repository, it's named SNV_ASSERT_FMT - just grep for it.
Which one should it be? Can't have half and half.
FCN seems more meaningful.
Paolo
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:21:15AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > #define PRINTF_ERROR(pi, str) \
> >-printf_error(pi, __FILE__, __LINE__, SNV_ASSERT_FMT, str);
> >+printf_error(pi, __FILE__, __LINE__, SNV_ASSERT_FCN, str);
> >
> >That's not defined anywhere.
>
> It is a function nam
On 2/25/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. Unfortunately you've backed two things I've done over the
last several days.
* snprintfv/custom.c: #include (conditionally) runetype.h
before wchar.h
* snprintfv/format.c: ditto
That's handled in compat.h
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:59:24PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini asked:
> > > Similarly to 'printf-frexp', here is the corresponding module for
> > > 'long double'.
> >
> > What's the difference from frexpl and why can't we obsolete that one?
>
> You see it by looking into the USE_FR
Paolo Bonzini asked:
> > Similarly to 'printf-frexp', here is the corresponding module for
> > 'long double'.
>
> What's the difference from frexpl and why can't we obsolete that one?
You see it by looking into the USE_FREXP_LDEXP branch of lib/printf-frexp.c:
- The normalization is different (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Libtool was just patched to change a lot of copyright license stanzas as
follows:
| You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
| -along with GNU Libtool; if not, write to the Free Software
| -Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Stree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 2/25/2007 7:05 PM:
>> 2007-02-25 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * m4/wchar.m4 (gl_WCHAR_H): Check for runetype.h.
>> * lib/wchar_.h [HAVE_RUNETYPE_H]: Include it when needed for Mac
>> OS/X.
>
> Befo
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:58:49AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Daniel Jacobowitz wrote on Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:29:53AM CET:
> >
> > That's from standalone libsnprintfv DLL support, which we're
> > obsoleting as we fold it into gnulib. It doesn't work quite right
> > anyway, since none of
Bruno Haible wrote:
Similarly to 'printf-frexp', here is the corresponding module for
'long double'.
What's the difference from frexpl and why can't we obsolete that one?
Paolo
15 matches
Mail list logo
