On 22 Feb 2007, at 18:34, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:42:59PM -0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
My copy is in ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/smalltalk/smalltalk-2.3.3.tar.gz
AFAIK, I have all the bugfixes from Gary and Bruce's stuff there.
Then we should probably take that one as
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:26:00AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:22:31AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >>
> >> Bad timing. I was about to make a test release.
> >> If anyone else has access to a Solaris 10 system (x86 or otherwise
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:42:59PM -0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >My copy is in ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/smalltalk/smalltalk-2.3.3.tar.gz
> >
> >AFAIK, I have all the bugfixes from Gary and Bruce's stuff there.
>
> Then we should probably take that one as the basis for submission to
> gnulib,
> u
Jim,
Thanks for the heads-up. We're trying to be as benign as possible when loaded
into a coreutils process.
Harv
--- Begin Message ---
Harvey Eneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Which functions are those?
>
> I was referring to getenv(3), putenv(3), unsetenv(3) and setenv(3) functions.
>
>
An occurrence of getlogin_r.h was missed. Fortunately, Simon's autobuild
site http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/ displayed it quickly.
2007-02-22 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/glob.c: Don't include getlogin_r.h.
*** lib/glob.c 26 Jan 2007 22:16:55 - 1.13
--- lib/
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:22:31AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> Why does your config.h define HAVE_PARTLY_WORKING_GETCWD
>> >> when using Sun C 5.8?
>> >
>> > So
This fixes it:
* modules/utimens (Depends-on): Add timespec, required for
utimens.h's inclusion of timespec.h.
Index: modules/utimens
===
RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/modules/utimens,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pathname.h and dirname.h define macros with the same names, but
> conflicting definitions. Should they be merged?
Well, if you want my biased opinion, pathname should go. :-)
The GNU Coding Standards say that one shouldn't use the word
"pathname" to desc
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A linker warning with a one or two line text is better than a link error
> because
>
> - We can enable a link warning even for cases where 90% of the uses of the
> functions are ok, such as
For cases like these, I'd rather not have a warning, as th
Harvey Eneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Which functions are those?
>
> I was referring to getenv(3), putenv(3), unsetenv(3) and setenv(3) functions.
>
> In my particular case, the LD_PRELOAD shared object starts a thread which
> will call getenv() but consider what could happen if the thread
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>>> time_.h from the time module uses restrict in the prototypes, but it
>>> doesn't depend on the restrict module. Installed.
>>
>> The 'restrict' module was removed on 2006-08-09. Now, inste
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> time_.h from the time module uses restrict in the prototypes, but it
>> doesn't depend on the restrict module. Installed.
>
> The 'restrict' module was removed on 2006-08-09. Now, instead we use an
> AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_RESTRICT]) in the auto
Hi Simon,
> time_.h from the time module uses restrict in the prototypes, but it
> doesn't depend on the restrict module. Installed.
The 'restrict' module was removed on 2006-08-09. Now, instead we use an
AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_RESTRICT]) in the autoconf macro. But...
gl_HEADER_TIME_H_BODY already req
Hello Ben, all,
* Ben Pfaff wrote on Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:24:04AM CET:
> I've finished my first stab at a "relocatable" module for gnulib.
Just a couple of very quick comments:
> +Second, the loader must be able to find shared libraries linked to
> +relocatable executables or referenced by ot
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If anyone else has access to a Solaris 10 system (x86 or otherwise),
> with Sun C, would you please try the latest snapshot?
I can't reproduce the problem now, so I'm not sure what went wrong.
Sorry. Well, at any rate the patch has been reverted.
>> On
time_.h from the time module uses restrict in the prototypes, but it
doesn't depend on the restrict module. Installed.
--- time12 Feb 2007 19:49:19 +0100 1.1
+++ time13 Feb 2007 17:39:37 +0100
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
Depends-on:
absolute-header
extensions
+restrict
config
16 matches
Mail list logo