Hi,
Now that sourceforge compilefarm disappeared, we need other ways to
estimate the portability of POSIX functions.
Also, the question "is this or that substitute still needed?" is asked
over and over again, and autoconf has no means to answer this question,
except if you collect the config.stat
Hello Karl,
> Forgive me, but I wanted to check to be sure: is it the case that for
> every foo_.h file in Gnulib, the corresponding foo.h file is generated
> at configure time?
Rather, it is generated at "make" time with information that has been
determined at configure time. It is also removed
Forgive me, but I wanted to check to be sure: is it the case that for
every foo_.h file in Gnulib, the corresponding foo.h file is generated
at configure time?
And therefore, for those of us who check in gnulib-tool generated files
to CVS, the foo.h's should *not* be checked in, and should be adde
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Why does your config.h define HAVE_PARTLY_WORKING_GETCWD
>> when using Sun C 5.8?
>
> Sorry, I don't know offhand. I don't currently have access to the
> affected machine but will try to get to it soon. It is S
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why does your config.h define HAVE_PARTLY_WORKING_GETCWD
> when using Sun C 5.8?
Sorry, I don't know offhand. I don't currently have access to the
affected machine but will try to get to it soon. It is Solaris 10
x86, patched to about a month ago. I b
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This will fail if the length of CWD is bigger than 4095 and some parts of
> it are unreadable.
Thanks for mentioning that. I backed out the change in gnulib. I'll
try to come up with a better way of fixing the problem on Solaris.
Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Anyway thanks for the quick fix, I nuked the line manually and that
>> seemed to fix IRIX. I am also going to test the new snapshot. So far
>> I have at least one test failure on IRIX that looks like a problem
>> with my perl i
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> coreutils "make check" failed on Solaris 10 with Sun C 5.8 due to "df
> ." failing. I tracked it down to a getcwd issue exposed by recent
> changes to getcwd.c, and installed this patch to gnulib.
>
> After installing this patch (and the other fixes I sent
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> coreutils "make check" failed on Solaris 10 with Sun C 5.8 due to "df
> ." failing. I tracked it down to a getcwd issue exposed by recent
> changes to getcwd.c, and installed this patch to gnulib.
>
> After installing this patch (and the other fixes I sen
coreutils "make check" failed on Solaris 10 with Sun C 5.8 due to "df
." failing. I tracked it down to a getcwd issue exposed by recent
changes to getcwd.c, and installed this patch to gnulib.
After installing this patch (and the other fixes I sent in just now),
"make check" succeeded on this pla
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed this to work around some porting problems on Solaris 10.
> dirfd needs declaring. And cc complains about rpl_putenv being
> redeclared with a different type, since Solaris 10 header files
> declare it with a char * arg.
>
> 2007-02-20 Paul Egge
11 matches
Mail list logo
