Re: m4/locale-tr.m4 missing

2007-02-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:45:35AM CET: > > (Recall that use of > changequote is more reliable than this [[ ]] workaround, IMO.) Sigh. I wish that if you had to keep your own ways of doing things this way, rather than using [[ ]] or quadrigraphs, then at least

Re: time_r.h -> time_.h

2007-02-12 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Paul, Here are some nitpicking remarks. - About gnulib-tool.texi: I don't agree with this paragraph You should include Gnulib-provided headers before system headers, so that Gnulib-provided headers can adjust

Re: m4/locale-tr.m4 missing

2007-02-12 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Ralf, > | /home/ralf/download/cvs/gnulib/t/../gnulib/m4/locale-tr.m4 not found > | gnulib-tool: *** Stop. Oops, sorry. Fixed now. Should have been part of the mbscasestr test cases. > The other two files m4/locale-fr.m4 and m4/locale-zh.m4 exist, but it > looks like they need a bit mor

m4/locale-tr.m4 missing

2007-02-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, all, $ gnulib-tool --with-tests --tests needs another file: [...] | tests/uniconv/test-u8-strconv-to-enc.c | gnulib-tool: *** file | /home/ralf/download/cvs/gnulib/t/../gnulib/m4/locale-tr.m4 not found | gnulib-tool: *** Stop. $ grep locale-tr modules/* | modules/mbscasecmp-

strncasecmp defined incorrectly in string_.h

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Eggert
I installed this: 2007-02-12 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * lib/string_.h (strncasecmp): Fix typo: this macro takes 3 args, not 2. --- lib/string_.h 11 Feb 2007 17:02:31 - 1.20 +++ lib/string_.h 12 Feb 2007 19:06:27 - @@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ extern int s

Re: time_r.h -> time_.h

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Eggert
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be nice to avoid '#include "time_r.h"' and just do '#include > ' in my code. OK, I've installed the following gnulib patch to implement this. I've tested this on Debian stable, Solaris 8, and OpenBSD 3.9 with coreutils, and on Debian stable

Re: gcc-4.3, glibc and AC_PROG_CC_STDC

2007-02-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:51:33PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > > Given that there is still discussion and work on GCC for this topic > > anyway[1], I don't think Autoconf should be doing anything just yet. Yeah, it is just too early. > Both of the solutions that Bruno suggested seem too drastic t