I installed this:
2006-09-20 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Import this patch from libc:
2006-09-06 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/regex_internal.c (re_string_reconstruct): Handle
offset < pstr->valid_raw_len && pstr->offsets_needed case.
En
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[I'm replying to several mails in this chain, sorry for any confusion it
causes]
According to Mikhail Teterin on 9/20/2006 8:59 AM:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 09:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> = > . Although FreeBSD's getopt.h is detected as sufficie
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :-( Are there regex-patches currently waiting to be merged into GNU's libc?
You can just do a diff between glibc and regex to find the list of
patches. They aren't marshaled into a coherent set of small patches,
which is the bottleneck. However, yo
середа 20 вересень 2006 17:12, Paul Eggert написав:
> Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, there is not a single place anywhere in m4's code (outside of
> > getopt*.c), where optind is set to zero.
>
> Other gnulib-using programs do rely on that functionality, though, so
> we te
середа 20 вересень 2006 13:24, Paul Eggert написав:
> Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see -- would you have a test-case, that detects this difference?
>
> No, but you can read the thread containing this message:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2004-10/msg00171.htm
I intsalled this:
2006-09-20 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* modules/mkstemp (Files): Add mkstemp.h.
--- modules/mkstemp 20 Sep 2006 18:48:29 - 1.10
+++ modules/mkstemp 20 Sep 2006 22:32:08 -
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Description:
mkstemp() function: create a private temp
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That doesn't sound like much of a real problem, but if it is, this
>> looks to me like a band-aid that doesn't solve things; it'd cut down
>> the number of bogus messages without eliminating them.
>
> This I don't understand. If I do the output with
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, there is not a single place anywhere in m4's code (outside of
> getopt*.c), where optind is set to zero.
Other gnulib-using programs do rely on that functionality, though, so
we test for it in gnulib.
It's not worth the configuration hassle
I also installed this further change, which shouldn't hurt either.
That old HAVE_MKSTEMP code was bogus anyway, since it should have
been HAVE_DECL_MKSTEMP.
2006-09-20 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* mkstemp-safer.c: Include "mkstemp.h" instead of .
(mkstemp): Remove, since mk
> Import this patch from libc:
>
> 2006-04-07 Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lib/tempname.c (__gen_tempname): Change attempts_min
> into a macro. Use preprocessor to decide how to initialize
> attempts [Coverity CID 67].
And I'm doing likewise for mkdte
[ Behdad, this is:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-09/msg00221.html ]
Hello Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:10:07PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * gnulib-tool (func_version): Create output all at once, to
> > avoid trigg
On 9/20/06, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the correct response is something along the lines of EINVAL
> whenever strlen(filedata) != filestat.st_size.
The GNU coding standards disagree: they say "Utilities reading files
should not drop NUL characters".
Wait. I get it. The GNU codi
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thanks for the report. Which platform, which compiler, and which version
>> of coreutils was this? If it is still present in coreutils 6.2, we would
>> like to get it fixed before 6.3.
>
> Yes, likewise.
>
> Look
Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If valid data is supposed to be ASCII text, then what meaning
> do you give to the NUL byte?
It depends on the application. The NUL character is valid in
ASCII. For 'sort', for example, it participates in comparison
as the least-possible character.
> If
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the report. Which platform, which compiler, and which version
> of coreutils was this? If it is still present in coreutils 6.2, we would
> like to get it fixed before 6.3.
Yes, likewise.
Looking at the implementation, it seems like there are
I installed this:
2006-09-20 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Import this patch from libc:
2006-04-07 Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/tempname.c (__gen_tempname): Change attempts_min
into a macro. Use preprocessor to decide how to initialize
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see -- would you have a test-case, that detects this difference?
No, but you can read the thread containing this message:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2004-10/msg00171.html
to see some of the issues here, and why gnulib getopt.m4 r
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 09:28, Eric Blake wrote:
= > . Although FreeBSD's getopt.h is detected as sufficiently capable
= > by configure, the getopt.c and getopt1.c are still compiled and
= > linked into m4, instead of relying on the libc's versions
=
= No, the FreeBSD's geto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
According to Mikhail Teterin on 9/20/2006 7:06 AM:
> Hello!
>
> In preparing an update of the FreeBSD port of m4 (currently at the 1.4.4) to
> 1.4.6, I noticed the following minor nits:
>
> . Although FreeBSD's getopt.h is detected as suf
19 matches
Mail list logo