Re: removed many uses of HAVE_CONFIG_H from gnulib

2006-09-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Paul, * Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:41:51AM CEST: > Since nobody needs HAVE_CONFIG_H any more, [...] What makes you reach this conclusion (for third-party packages, not for some well-maintained GNU packages)? Why was there a need at one time but not now? > If this is a re

Re: removed many uses of HAVE_CONFIG_H from gnulib

2006-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Paul Eggert on 9/13/2006 4:41 PM: > > If this is a real problem for anybody (which I think it won't be), > we can define a new no-config-h module which reverses the change. The only real problem I had was this typo, with the fix checked

Re: getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Paul Eggert
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2006-09-13 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * getdate.m4: Don't AC_LIBOBJ([getdate]), automake takes care of > that internally, suggested by Ralf Wildenhues > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Thanks, I installed that.

Re: [bug-gnulib] getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > However, it seems arguable correct (right?), so I propose to install > the patch below in gnulib-tool. Ok? > > /Simon > > --- gnulib-tool 12 Sep 2006 17:37:41 +0200 1.159 > +++ gnulib-tool 13 Sep 2006 15:50:00 +0200 > @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ >fi

Re: getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:56:16PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think the fix is to drop the AC_LIBOBJ line from getdate.m4. But > > Automake also could warn against this (it warns in a slightly simpler > > setting not involving

Re: getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I think the fix is to drop the AC_LIBOBJ line from getdate.m4. But >> Automake also could warn against this (it warns in a slightly simpler >> setting not involving built sources). For this however, gn

Re: getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the fix is to drop the AC_LIBOBJ line from getdate.m4. But > Automake also could warn against this (it warns in a slightly simpler > setting not involving built sources). For this however, gnulib-tool > should use $(LIBOBJS) instead of @LIBOB

Re: getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ quoting generously for bug-automake ] Hello Simon. * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:19:04PM CEST: > When building Shishi using latest gnulib, I got this: > > ../gl/.libs/libgnu.a(lt1-getdate.o): In function `yyparse': > /home/jas/src/shishi/gl/getdate.c:1398: multiple definit

Re: *_LDFLAGS vs. *_LDADD vs. *_LIBADD

2006-09-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ automake added; this is http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-09/msg00141.html ] Hello Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:10:11PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > And for executables, an *_LDADD variable exists, but the automake doc says > > > the opposite

getdate.lo is linked twice to libgnu.la

2006-09-13 Thread Simon Josefsson
When building Shishi using latest gnulib, I got this: ../gl/.libs/libgnu.a(lt1-getdate.o): In function `yyparse': /home/jas/src/shishi/gl/getdate.c:1398: multiple definition of `yyparse' ../gl/.libs/libgnu.a(getdate.o):/home/jas/src/shishi/gl/getdate.c:1398: first defined here ../gl/.libs/libgnu.