Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about this, so coreutils' "make distcheck" passes once again?
> It avoids a warning from -Wshadow.
Sure! I installed that. Odd, I thought I checked -Wshadow, but
obviously I didn't.
Hi Paul,
How about this, so coreutils' "make distcheck" passes once again?
It avoids a warning from -Wshadow.
2006-08-30 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* isapipe.c (isapipe): Rename local s/fd/fd_pair/ to avoid shadowing
the parameter.
Index: lib/isapipe.c
==
"Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was under the impression that license texts were
> essentially in the public domain, but that's probably not true.
Yes, it's not true. In fact, it's more the reverse. License texts
themselves typically have the most-restrictive license that the
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> Next, I tried different --source-base dirs. With separate imports, this
> almost works (although I found that some modules, like unlocked-io and
> config-h, must be --imported into both libraries). The problem comes when
> doing "gnulib-tool --update" in the boo
Simon Josefsson extundo.com> writes:
> I'm not sure how to best describe this. I note that the fdl module
> has the same problem:
>
> doc/fdl.texi
> ...
> License:
> public domain
>
> How about a new license 'unmodifiable license text', which we fix in
> gnulib-tool to be compatible wi
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006 at 09:27, Simon Josefsson wrote:
[..]
> > +public domain
>
> This seems wrong though, the license of the GPL is:
>
> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
>
> I'm not sure how to
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204567,
James Antill wrote:
> Summary: base64 -d doesn't accept base64 output
>
> Description of problem:
> base64 -d doesn't accept returns (which the base64 encoding should put
> every 76 characters and at the end of the encoding).
>
> Ve
"Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw the fdl module, which is nice because my GNU project GMediaServer uses
> fdl.texi in its documentation. It however also uses gpl.texi, which is why I
> propose this module.
Good idea.
> +License:
> +public domain
This seems wrong though, the
