Hello Karl,
Sorry for the delay.
* Karl Berry wrote on Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:51:10AM CEST:
>
> 3) There is a content error in the DESTDIR node: it does not work to
> specify DESTDIR at configure time,
>
> Ok, good.
> +./configure CC=gcc
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] example
> +is
Title: problem importing argp
I imported the argp module, seemingly successfully. I added the appropriate lines to configure.ac and Makefile.am. When I run autoreconf, I receive this message:
lib/Makefile.am:18: required file `lib/memcmp.c' not found
lib/Makefile.am:18: required file `lib/ma
> There's one more gnulib file that lacks a copyright notice:
> gnulib/doc/regexprops-generic.texi. I'm wondering: who uses that
> file? (There's no ChangeLog entry for it.) If the file's not needed,
> I'm inclined to remove it, along with gnulib/doc/README.\
CVS Head of M4 wants to use it:
htt
we should be generating it automatically from findutils
My recollection is that James does generate it from findutils, and
checks in the new version to gnulib, or sends it to me, or something
like that. James will inform us, I'm sure.
I am inclined to finesse the license issue by using the a
There's one more gnulib file that lacks a copyright notice:
gnulib/doc/regexprops-generic.texi. I'm wondering: who uses that
file? (There's no ChangeLog entry for it.) If the file's not needed,
I'm inclined to remove it, along with gnulib/doc/README.
But if it is needed we should probably get t
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All fine with me (since, as far as I understood, the GFDL with "no
> Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover
> Texts" is free enough that Debian can distribute it).
Thanks for the quick review; I installed it.
> I'll then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> The text which rms specified for such things (ensconced in
> maintain.texi) is:
>
> Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
> are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
> notice and this notice are pre
gnulib/m4/gnulib-cache.m4 does not list the 'getopt' module.
How puzzling -- that was the very first module I used. I wonder what
happened. Oh well.
$GNULIB_TOOL --import getopt
fixed it for me.
Great, thank you very much for fixing my bug :).
Ralf> How can we get at a mo
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bruno, can you please review the following patches to fix the
> remaining copyright-notice problems in gnulib? I'll install them if
> that will save you time.
All fine with me (since, as far as I understood, the GFDL with "no
Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> +This file is free documentation; the Free Software Foundation
> +gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
> +with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
>
> The text which rms specified for such things (e
Since they aren't intended to be copied into applications I think it's
ok to add a single file containing the copyright notice for the
collection
FWIW, I concur. This is already done in other cases too, e.g., a
directory full of image files.
Thanks,
Karl
Karl, can you please update the FDL license version iin standards.texi
and make-stds.texi?
Strange, I have a strong memory of doing this once before. Oh well.
Also, while you're at it there's some trailing
white space to remove. Here's a patch.
Thanks much, installed.
+This file is free documentation; the Free Software Foundation
+gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
The text which rms specified for such things (ensconced in
maintain.texi) is:
Copying and dist
On 8/14/06, Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think gnulib-tool should be changed so that gnulib-cache.m4 is always
distributed. Objections?
Yes! :)
Auto-tooled projects have enough bloat already and are not
in any need of more. Your desire for this is simply to track gnulib
usage fo
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> would you mind a list of URLs pointing to general CVS
> instructions rather than a web interface? Usually the latter is only a
> couple of clicks away from the former, but the other way is difficult to
> find.
Might make sense if you're interested in different things than
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The file is only about a page, and forcing everyone to distribute a
> copy of the GFDL with this file seems excessive. How about the
> following license instead, which you used in some other files?
Sure, that's fine; I installed that.
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed this. The only part that might be iffy is the copyright
> notice, but we have to have _some_ copyright notice or otherwise the
> file isn't free, and the GFDL without any required texts seems most
> appropriate.
The file is only about a page,
Thanks for the updates. I installed this, which also does some other
things. Most of the changes are white-space.
2006-08-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* users.txt: Add bison, diffutils, libprelude, prelude-lml,
prelude-manager. User shorter URLs for GNU projects, withou
Bruno, can you please review the following patches to fix the
remaining copyright-notice problems in gnulib? I'll install them if
that will save you time. Thanks.
2006-08-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Add copyright notices to long-enough files that lack them, since
otherw
Karl, can you please update the FDL license version iin standards.texi
and make-stds.texi? Also, while you're at it there's some trailing
white space to remove. Here's a patch. Thanks.
2006-08-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* make-stds.texi, standards.texi: Update FDL version num
I installed the following to add and/or fix the copyright notices of
modules that I help maintain, or for which I expect Simon won't mind
adding a notice.
I'll send out two other messages on this subject, one for Bruno and
one for Karl, to address the files they maintain.
The modules files were t
I installed this. The only part that might be iffy is the copyright
notice, but we have to have _some_ copyright notice or otherwise the
file isn't free, and the GFDL without any required texts seems most
appropriate.
Come to think of it, there are several other gnulib files where the
copyright n
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Eric Blake-1 wrote on Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:23:05PM CEST:
> > * Bruno Haible wrote:
> > >
> > > (*) I added to gnulib a file users.txt listing the uses of gnulib that
> > > I found so far.
> >
> > Nice list. I sorted it, and add
Paul Eggert CS.UCLA.EDU> writes:
>
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> > Meanwhile, is this patch acceptable, which updates the _LIBC
> > portions of the error module to resemble CVS glibc more closely, so
> > that I have fewer spurious diffs to filter through?
>
> Yes, and thanks for doing som
* Eric Blake-1 wrote on Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:23:05PM CEST:
> * Bruno Haible wrote:
> >
> > (*) I added to gnulib a file users.txt listing the uses of gnulib that
> > I found so far.
>
> Nice list. I sorted it, and added tar.
Thanks to both of you. Before I add libtool (its CVS version u
Hello Karl,
* Karl Berry wrote on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:36:11PM CEST:
> In trying to prepare the release of (gasp) GNU Hello, I'm finding that
> some gnulib files are being left out of the distribution tar.gz,
> specifically the getopt-related ones. It looks like this is because the
> gnulib Ma
Karl Berry wrote:
> In trying to prepare the release of (gasp) GNU Hello, I'm finding that
> some gnulib files are being left out of the distribution tar.gz,
> specifically the getopt-related ones. It looks like this is because the
> gnulib Makefile.am just has:
>
> libgnu_a_SOURCES =
> libgnu_a_
In trying to prepare the release of (gasp) GNU Hello, I'm finding that
some gnulib files are being left out of the distribution tar.gz,
specifically the getopt-related ones. It looks like this is because the
gnulib Makefile.am just has:
libgnu_a_SOURCES =
libgnu_a_LIBADD = @LIBOBJS@
noinst_HEADER
28 matches
Mail list logo
