-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The current test that checks for the existence of isn't
> > sufficient on SGI when using the compiler in (its default?) C89 mode,
> > because the SGI compil
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The current test that checks for the existence of isn't
> sufficient on SGI when using the compiler in (its default?) C89 mode,
> because the SGI compiler doesn't have fatal #error directives:
If you ignore the warning, does anything break? If not,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
The current test that checks for the existence of isn't
sufficient on SGI when using the compiler in (its default?) C89 mode,
because the SGI compiler doesn't have fatal #error directives:
Larry Jones wrote:
> Well, it appears that it is com
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that gnulib assumes C89 or better, do we still need the code in
> strto[dl].c, unicodeio.c, and unsetenv.c that does this?
>
> #ifndef errno
> extern int errno;
> #endif
I don't think so, not any more. It used to be that we merely assumed
C89 freestan
Thanks for pointing that out. There's a similar problem in
utimens.c. I fixed them both.