Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 5. I have no idea whether using flockfile/funlockfile is appropriate.
I'd say it's appropriate, but only if flockfile/funlockfile exist.
They don't exist on all platforms. POSIX says they're optional;
they're part of the Thread Safe Functions extensi
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
> > I am using the latest release of Debian GNU/Linux (3.1, released only
> > last month), and one of the most widely used browsers (Firefox 1.0.4
> > as maintained by Debian). But I can't read all the characters in that
> > web page telling me how to quote
5. I have no idea whether using flockfile/funlockfile is appropriate.
The glibc code invoked some locking macros, which I translated into
flockfile/funlockfile. getndelim2 does not appear to do any
locking, though. Reading the man page for flockfile, using them
didn't seem like an obv
This is a rough start, to let you see my thinking. If this is OK,
I'll write ChangeLog entries for it. The getdelim in glibc appear to
suffer from a missing overflow check in the realloc call, but I may be
mistaken. I fixed that while porting the code below.
1. There are separate modules for ge
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 1) Port the libc LGPL getdelim into a gnulib module.
>> 2a) Port the libc LGPL getline into a gnulib module.
>> 2b) Write a gnulib LGPL getline module that use the gnulib LGPL getdelim.
>> 3) Keep the curren
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Port the libc LGPL getdelim into a gnulib module.
> 2a) Port the libc LGPL getline into a gnulib module.
> 2b) Write a gnulib LGPL getline module that use the gnulib LGPL getdelim.
> 3) Keep the current getndelim2 as a GPL module.
>
> The libc getli
