-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Berry wrote:
> GNU getopt tries to do too much when it reorders the commandline and
> therefor needs the "+" as a workaround.
>
>I don't suppose it matters at this point, but I fail to see the
>connection here. You can tell GNU getopt to REQUIRE_
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Revised patch attached.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks; I installed the following slightly-different patch.
>
>
Works for me. Thanks Paul.
Derek
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gn
GNU getopt tries to do too much when it reorders the commandline and
therefor needs the "+" as a workaround.
I don't suppose it matters at this point, but I fail to see the
connection here. You can tell GNU getopt to REQUIRE_ORDER instead of
PERMUTE without using +, either directly or set
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Revised patch attached.
Thanks; I installed the following slightly-different patch.
2005-05-10 Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* getopt.m4 (gl_GETOPT): Check for Solaris 10 bug, not decl, when
possible.
--- getopt.m4 6 May 2005 01:0
Derek Price writes:
>
> Okay, looking at that in C89 now, but just out of curiosity, if argv
> needs to be NULL terminated, what's the point of argc?
I believe it was added for convenience back in the dark ages. All the
Unix exec functions require a null-terminated argument list (and don't
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Kurz wrote:
>I'm running out of time. I have to quit. Thanks very much for your effords.
>When there is something to test, i'll still try to help.
No problem. Thanks for your help, Matthias.
Regards,
Derek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>>+ myargv[[0]] = "conftest";
>>+ myargv[[1]] = "-+";
>>
>>
>
>This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
>
>
Okay, looking at that in C89 now, but just out of curiosity, if argv
needs to be NULL terminated, what
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>>+ myargv[[0]] = "conftest";
>>+ myargv[[1]] = "-+";
>>
>>
>
>This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
>
>But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
>assuming Solaris 11 getopt might g
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch that address several issues in the getaddrinfo GnuLib
> module implementation:
Applied!
The getaddrinfo module is rather incomplete, so you, or anyone else,
wish to read the standard and review the code for missing pieces
James Youngman wrote:
> Paul> +static int
> Paul> +fts_compar (void const *a, void const *b)
> Paul> +{
> Paul>/* ... */
> Paul> + return pa[0]->fts_fts->fts_compar (pa, pb);
> Paul> +}
> ... compilers are likely to be able to inline the actual
> subroutine call away in any case.
How should t
On Tue, May 10, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
[...]
> > But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
> > assuming Solaris 11 getopt might get fixed? But even in that case,
> > the current code will work, right, since it will use
11 matches
Mail list logo
