>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Like the below?
Yes, looks good! Thank you, Eli.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> Perhaps we should avoid auto -hook’ifying the variable name only if the name
>> does not already end in ‘-functions’?
> Either that, or maybe exempt FOO-mode from the boundp test.
This sounds likely to be even better.
--
Joh
nts or suggestions?
Sigh, I should have thought of this. There will be many such collisions, in
fact.
Perhaps we should avoid auto -hook’ifying the variable name only if the name
does not already end in ‘-functions’?
What do you think, Eli?
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
