Thank you, and thanks for your help.
Aaron
On Mon, Sep 2 2024 at 3:01 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 02/09/2024 04:56, Aaron Jensen wrote:
>
> It seems to me that anything other than 0 spaces would look inconsistent
> with the first element (the hash), and its closing brace i
> It seems to me that anything other than 0 spaces would look inconsistent
> with the first element (the hash), and its closing brace in particular.
Yeah, that's my sense as well, even if it looks awful, but you get what you get.
> >> * Support for the new option in ruby-ts-mode (it's good to hav
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 8:19 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2024 22:28, Aaron Jensen wrote:
>
> > Here's a corrected patch for that particular example. Thank you for
> > finding that. I think I missed it because as long as you type the code
> > in, it ind
change the default. I wasn't sure if you wanted to change the
defaults of all of the variables you added in the last round or just this
one, so I'll let you handle that the way you want to.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 12:36 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Hi Aaron!
>
&g
Updated patch with more precise variables in the new test.
Aaron
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 7:41 PM, Aaron Jensen wrote:
> I made an attempt at this (attached). It introduces a new variable:
>
> ruby-bracketed-args-indent
>
> It is set to t by default and the behavior will be a
r code
this way that they likely have rather idiosyncratic formatting requirements
and they would be best left to do what they want manually.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 8:38 PM, Aaron Jensen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 8:16 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>
> Vim's choice l
