[bug #47220] Assertion "fdleak.c:382: complain_about_leaky_fds" during find

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #47220 (project findutils): It would really be interesting to be able to reproduce. It seems that there's either a leak in xargs, or a bug in the detection whether there are leaks. With the given information so far, I think it's the latter, i.e., it reports false positiv

[bug #56142] Incoherence between info and man about the effect of -print on the default action

Update of bug #56142 (project findutils): Assigned to:None => jay ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #56142] Incoherence between info and man about the effect of -print on the default action

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #56142 (project findutils): I think the attached patch should fix the problem. (file #46864) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: 0001-doc-fix-bug-56142-by-specifying-which-actions-inhibi.patch Size:2 KB

[bug #56142] Incoherence between info and man about the effect of -print on the default action

Update of bug #56142 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed ___ Reply to this item at: ___

Re: [bug #56142] Incoherence between info and man about the effect of -print on the default action

I already pushed this patch. If there are corrections, I will fix them in a follow-up change. From e5990526859af7b62eb3840a9a6806c81c23b693 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Youngman Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 00:42:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix bug #56142 by specifying which actions inhibit

Re: Document that find -maxdepth is a GNU extension

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:28 AM Bernhard Voelker wrote: > > On 4/16/19 6:41 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > As a find user I would rather see the info manual dropped than the > > manpage. My recollection of user feedback is that most users who contact this list feel the same way. However the GNU