Re: xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2005-11-22 Tim Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:30:50AM +, James Youngman wrote: > > Thanks for discovering and fixing the bug. > With 4.2.26 I'm finding a test suite failure with the new tests on > x86_64: [...] Hello, Similar experience on Debian's buildds:

Re: xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-22 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:35:15AM +, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:30:50AM +, James Youngman wrote: > > > Thanks for discovering and fixing the bug. > > With 4.2.26 I'm finding a test suite failure with the new tests on > x86_64: Same here. > Running > /tmp/twaugh/find

Re: xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-22 Thread Tim Waugh
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:30:50AM +, James Youngman wrote: > Thanks for discovering and fixing the bug. With 4.2.26 I'm finding a test suite failure with the new tests on x86_64: Running /tmp/twaugh/findutils-4.2.26/xargs/testsuite/xargs.posix/arg_max_32bit_linux_bug.exp ... FAIL: arg_max

Re: xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-19 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 02:54:36PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) wrote: > ... > > Many systems now include the 'buffer' program (I have it here on an > > Ubuntu box). If you have it, try piping the data through 'buffer -z > > 4096' (or whatever PIPE_BUF is on your

xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-18 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) wrote: ... > Many systems now include the 'buffer' program (I have it here on an > Ubuntu box). If you have it, try piping the data through 'buffer -z > 4096' (or whatever PIPE_BUF is on your machine if it's not 4096). Hi James, Funny seeing a message from you,