Re: perm.texi from coreutils

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:08:35PM -0500, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, James Youngman wrote: > > > I suspect we can just take the update as-is. But I would be grateful if > > you could check. > > The changes were minimal enough to make a readable patch (as far as > patches go).

Re: perm.texi from coreutils

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, James Youngman wrote: > > I am willing to volunteer to look into precisely what merges would be > > necessary to take their changes. > > I suspect we can just take the update as-is. But I would be grateful if > you could check. The changes were minimal enough to make a readab

Re: perm.texi from coreutils

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:51PM -0500, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > A documentation patch that I sent to the coreutils folks about a few typos > in perm.texi was applied last month. findutils could update its > "Permissions" section of the file by getting the latest version from them. Good plan.

perm.texi from coreutils

A documentation patch that I sent to the coreutils folks about a few typos in perm.texi was applied last month. findutils could update its "Permissions" section of the file by getting the latest version from them. - Findutils version: