Re: flag for one second timestamp comparison granularity

2005-06-10 Thread Dan Jacobson
Well, I was just miffed that one can do $ while cp -u ... which in some situations will never stop. J> why stop at one second? The MS-DOS FAT filesystem has a two-second J> granularity Ah, no wonder. Ok, --granularity=2... ___ Bug-findutils mailing li

Re: flag for one second timestamp comparison granularity

2005-06-10 Thread Paul Eggert
James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the timestamps are different, they're different. After all, why > stop at one second? The MS-DOS FAT filesystem has a two-second > granularity and I don't hear people clamouring to have a feature where > the time values for tools are computed &(~1)

Re: flag for one second timestamp comparison granularity

2005-06-09 Thread James Youngman
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:18:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Perhaps add a flag to cp, find, etc. to reduce time comparisons to > only one second granularity, as depending on the device mounted, or if > we have since rebooted, times that should be the same can be reported > back differently by t

flag for one second timestamp comparison granularity

2005-06-08 Thread Dan Jacobson
Perhaps add a flag to cp, find, etc. to reduce time comparisons to only one second granularity, as depending on the device mounted, or if we have since rebooted, times that should be the same can be reported back differently by the operating system. Or at least add a warning on man and Info pages.