Re: Missing bits of regexprops.texi

Thanks for reporting this bug. The attached patches, which I plan to submit shortly, fix the problem. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > The documentation as generated for findutils refers to "ed" syntax, > but does not define it. ("posix-basic" is given as a synonym for >

Missing bits of regexprops.texi

The documentation as generated for findutils refers to "ed" syntax, but does not define it. ("posix-basic" is given as a synonym for "ed".) -- https://rrt.sc3d.org