> None of those examples show the block counts from ls ("ls -s"). Find
> reports both the file size in bytes (column 7) and the blocks used
> (column 2). They're reported the same in both ls and find:
>
> ~$ ls -dils TRACE.gz ; find TRACE.gz -ls ; stat TRACE.gz
> 181286 36 -rw-r--r--. 1 james u
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Peggy Russell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across something in the `find` documentation while trying GNU
> commands with SI Decimal (--SI) and IEC Binary Prefixes (--human-readable).
>
> The ACTION `-ls` says it reports the size in 1K blocks. From reading the
> info pag
Hi,
I came across something in the `find` documentation while trying GNU
commands with SI Decimal (--SI) and IEC Binary Prefixes (--human-readable).
The ACTION `-ls` says it reports the size in 1K blocks. From reading the
info page on "Block Size", it looks more like `find -ls` is reporting the
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 14 August 2010 16:46, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> On 4 August 2010 09:54, James Youngman wrote:
>>> I'm not sure the two options need to be exclusive.
>>
>> Fair enough, especially as it's machine generated, so the maintenance
>> problem I
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> gnulib people: you seem to be unhappy with code-generated
> documentation. How would you like to proceed?
It's OK to have documentation include pieces of the code if the
extraction and update is done by us (the maintainers). What we would
like to avoid is that people/distros
On 14 August 2010 16:46, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 4 August 2010 09:54, James Youngman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> "in regexprops-generic.texi, I think that having a plain English
>>> definition of the various syntaxes obscures the fact that each is
>>>
On 4 August 2010 09:54, James Youngman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
>> "in regexprops-generic.texi, I think that having a plain English
>> definition of the various syntaxes obscures the fact that each is
>> defined as a strict combination of features. Would you
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> I've volunteered to help get GNU regex documentation into gnulib.
> Bruno Haible pointed me here because of one of my suggestions which
> potentially affects findutils. I wrote:
>
> "in regexprops-generic.texi, I think that having a plain Engl
I've volunteered to help get GNU regex documentation into gnulib.
Bruno Haible pointed me here because of one of my suggestions which
potentially affects findutils. I wrote:
"in regexprops-generic.texi, I think that having a plain English
definition of the various syntaxes obscures the fact that e
