[PATCH 3/4] maint: generate ChangeLog with --no-cluster

2021-09-19 Thread Bernhard Voelker
* build-aux/gen-changelog.sh: Call gitlog-to-changelog with the --no-cluster option. The resulting ChangeLog reads better, because each commit get its own date/author line. --- build-aux/gen-changelog.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/build-aux/gen-changelog.sh b/build-aux

[PATCH] Add a shell script to generate ChangeLog; strip cherrypick comments.

2016-01-01 Thread James Youngman
* build-aux/gen-changelog.sh: Shell script for generating the ChangeLog. The effect is much the same as the previous version of the gen-ChangeLog rule, but it is easier to run this script to discover what the ChangeLog resulting from a recent commit is. The only change is that we now also use

Re: [Ping] [PATCH] Support relative command name for git-merge-changelog program.

2015-05-10 Thread James Youngman
Sorry I didn't reply to this earlier. I believe that, since I just deleted import-gnulib.sh, your problem should not occur again. James.

[Ping] [PATCH] Support relative command name for git-merge-changelog program.

2013-06-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 06/03/2013 05:58 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Otherwise, even after correctly setting the git configuration entry > 'merge.merge-changelog.driver' to "git-merge-changelog %O %A %B" > (which is perfectly valid), the 'import-gnulib.sh' script aborts >

[PATCH] Support relative command name for git-merge-changelog program.

2013-06-03 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Otherwise, even after correctly setting the git configuration entry 'merge.merge-changelog.driver' to "git-merge-changelog %O %A %B" (which is perfectly valid), the 'import-gnulib.sh' script aborts with the following spurious error: ERROR: Merge driver git-merge-chan

Re: [PATCH] Switch to using a merge driver for the ChangeLog file.

2009-03-09 Thread James Youngman
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, James Youngman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> According to James Youngman on 3/8/2009 7:43 AM: >>> * .gitattributes: new file >> >> You went with the name merge.cl-merge.driver, w

Re: [PATCH] Switch to using a merge driver for the ChangeLog file.

2009-03-09 Thread James Youngman
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to James Youngman on 3/8/2009 7:43 AM: >> * .gitattributes: new file > > You went with the name merge.cl-merge.driver, while gnulib, coreutils, > autoconf, libtool, and m4 all used mer

Re: [PATCH] Switch to using a merge driver for the ChangeLog file.

2009-03-08 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to James Youngman on 3/8/2009 7:43 AM: > * .gitattributes: new file You went with the name merge.cl-merge.driver, while gnulib, coreutils, autoconf, libtool, and m4 all used merge.merge-changelog.driver. I think it would be nice to go with

Re: [PATCH] Switch to using a merge driver for the ChangeLog file.

2009-03-08 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:43 PM, James Youngman wrote: > * import-gnulib.sh (check_merge_driver): New function; verifies > that we have a merge driver installed for the ChangeLog file (if > we're on the master or release branch, the check is skipped). > Also check that the .g

[PATCH] Switch to using a merge driver for the ChangeLog file.

2009-03-08 Thread James Youngman
* import-gnulib.sh (check_merge_driver): New function; verifies that we have a merge driver installed for the ChangeLog file (if we're on the master or release branch, the check is skipped). Also check that the .gitattributes file exists. * README-hacking: Point out that using a merge drive

Re: [PATCH] Correct the format of some of the older date/author headers in the ChangeLog.

2008-12-09 Thread James Youngman
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:43 AM, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Sorry, that earlier email was supposed to come with some human-readable text. > > David, I think you already told me that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was an email > address you're happy to use. Eric, the [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: findutils po/ChangeLog file

2007-08-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Leslie P. Polzer on 8/23/2007 3:42 AM: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:11:09AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: >> Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? >> I cannot spot any related emails, but I

Re: findutils po/ChangeLog file

2007-08-23 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:11:09AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: > Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? > I cannot spot any related emails, but I'm fairly sure this was > discussed? Can't remember anything like that. > My thinking is that po

findutils po/ChangeLog file

2007-08-23 Thread James Youngman
Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? I cannot spot any related emails, but I'm fairly sure this was discussed? My thinking is that po/ChangeLog is not very interesting. I propose to remove it.Would you prefer to see the .po file changes in findutils/Chan

Re: ChangeLog

2007-04-07 Thread James Youngman
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does findutils require developers to update ChangeLog, or is the RCS log enough? Please update the ChangeLog; it's a convention used by most GNU tools. The format looks like this: Timestamp Yourname * filename (functio

ChangeLog

2007-04-07 Thread leslie . polzer
Does findutils require developers to update ChangeLog, or is the RCS log enough? -- NEW homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83 pgpGSuNnjeDdL.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Bug